tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8861197.post7252228996644134004..comments2023-06-27T16:51:05.805+02:00Comments on The Pangrammaticon: James and Rawls, PangrammaticistsThomashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04858865501469168339noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8861197.post-37819777782001278342009-04-25T13:52:00.000+02:002009-04-25T13:52:00.000+02:00Hmmm... I like the instructive use of words idea.....Hmmm... I like the instructive use of words idea... Perhaps more later...Presskornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03480116067878605339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8861197.post-31939019409580950962009-04-25T08:30:00.000+02:002009-04-25T08:30:00.000+02:00Thanks. I am in doubt too. Always have been. They ...Thanks. I am in doubt too. Always have been. They are not descriptions of concepts or their use. They can't be because "description" and "concept" can be used pangrammatically ("use" perhaps not). They are pangrammatically instructive uses of <I>words</I>.<br /><br />I'm not even sure we can call them distinctinctly "philosophical" remarks. Sometimes an arrangement of homologies are more like poetry than philosophy. That is, the reading experience is primarily emotional, not conceptual. Their first virtue, as it were, is sometimes not clarity but intensity.Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04858865501469168339noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8861197.post-89162084032002647602009-04-25T06:33:00.000+02:002009-04-25T06:33:00.000+02:00This is one of the better statements of your pangr...This is one of the better statements of your pangrammaticism. Nevertheless, and do forgive me if I'm being stupid after all these years of visiting The Pangrammaticon, what is pangrammaticism really all about? Are your pangrammatical homologies descriptions of how concepts are actually (roughly) used? Or are they pieces of constructive philosophy? Are they are 'true' in some sense or are they just to be deconstructed by some further analysis? <br /><br />I find your pangrammatical homologies quite convincing and yet I am in doubt of what they actually are? <br /><br />One thing, I'd like them to be is perspicuous presentations of how different concepts relate, but is that all (or less) there is to them?Presskornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03480116067878605339noreply@blogger.com