Sunday, April 19, 2009

Moral Reasoning

This short piece in the NYT provides an occasion for me to state that, pangrammatically, "moral reasoning" is a contradiction in terms. While I don't agree that we should leave the study of morals to psychology, I do think philosophers should get out of that racket. What they call "moral reasoning" should be left to the "moral passioning", if you will, of poets.

The best argument I have for this appeals to the hard-headed rationalists among philosophers. How do they react when their students tell them "how they feel" about epistemological matters. "I just, you know, feel that people should be able to believe whatever they feel good believing in, okay?" Well, that's the sort of thing I hear when philosophers tell me "what they think" on ethical issues.

Thinking your way to justice is like feeling your way to truth.

Note: I actually don't have a pangrammatically homologous word for "morals". Roughly: Morals are to ethics as __________ are to epistemology. (Note the plural, we are looking for countable epistemological conditions. Beliefs are no good; we already have desires.)

1 comment:

  1. M / oral

    Sigma or

    Sign aural

    Sea Narr all

    Sea of Fools

    awl?

    puncture / wound
    tool

    Morality is the branch
    of symbolic prosthesis
    which allowed for
    the first bureacritization
    of tekne and the creation
    of social hierarchy
    based on judging
    the various victims
    or perpetrators of

    entrainment at the conceptus

    The Greeks were notoriously
    unethical; greedy;slimy
    etc and vindictive

    morality is an extension
    of orality

    now at this point we'vre got
    far to many emotional topologies woven into our beings to do much about thinking about society in terms of complexity and conservation

    every act is just another hundred billion shades of grey

    what can't be worked out in language is the fact that

    intelligence
    stupidity
    and complexity

    are all the same thing

    right there
    is a major bifurcation
    break point in the cultural
    reasoning called difference

    words themselves are distortions
    of geometric bio-indexical memory processes but we have invested
    these geo-bio-indexical morphologies with so much gravitas
    that the vital substance of the biome is yoked to these vampiric provisionalities which have all kinds of polarizing affects

    the total effect however
    is stabilizing at one level
    and destabilizing at some other larger scale

    the term holarchical comes to mind

    It's all quite charming
    and bizarre
    it reflects quite perfectly
    our own weird situation
    so alienated
    from what could be a huge body of alien cultural experience
    which we will probably never see
    and which may not exist

    As Doctor Spock says

    "Fascinating"

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.